Deb, I'm not meaning to argue with you, it's just that this type of infantile self-entitlement really irritates me.
I guess it'll all boil down to contract law in Nevada. He obviously had some kind of contract with the escort service, but he then entered into a new oral contract with the woman herself. Its like whenever I made any changes (more/less minutes, new phone, whatever) to my old Sprint phone account, they would always say, at a later date, that I had entered into a new 2 yr. contract, although I hadn't actually orally agreed to or signed a physical 2 yr. contract in over 8 years. They just took that liberty, and had the lawyers and fine print to back it up. This pissed me off, so I paid the $300 "early contract termination fee," and stopped ordering hookers from them. I'm sure, in the escort's mind, the new contract was that she did the sexual favor and got to leave when it was over. It probably never occurred to her that this needed to be spelled out. I bet if he had said, "I need you to hold my hand until I fall asleep" or whatever, she'd have said, "Well, Mr. Weirdo-pants, that'll be $X more."
If I were feeling any compassion for this Hubert Blackman yutz whatsoever, I guess I'd feel bad that he's humiliated his family and ruined any chances of dating or gainful employment, at least until he changes his name. Maybe $1.8 million in damages have been done, if somehow you could place a value on his life before he ruined it himself. Maybe he should sue his parents for letting him grow up with this disgusting sense of entitlement and need for vengeance.
On the other hand, if I were in the habit of going to Vegas and hiring private escorts, this company would be the first one I'd call, just for novelty's sake. I hope their business triples. And I hope the woman in question, quite possibly a single mom as so many escorts are, doesn't suffer any more than she already has as a result of a regretful Hubert Blackman.