Hello Mr. Capobianco,
Thank you for posting a reply to my questions.
As is the nature of most things, your answers lead me to think of more questions!
I very much appreciated your point of view concerning my questions, particularly in regards to the following:
effect of supply/demand on the tattoo industry
Like most of the public, I mistook the growth of tattoo culture in the general public's awareness to be translated into more clients overall for everyone. But, it appears to have just forced a sort of 'death of the middle' cycle, where 'popular' tattooers at the top of the pyramid are able to support themselves via long wait lists, merchandising, etc. that are an outgrowth of 'fame.' Then at the bottom of the pyramid, you have all the people who are recent 'scratchers', who are opening fly by night shops, 'home-based' businesses, etc. Then you have artists in the middle, who are good to great, in terms of craft getting out-branded from the top and then undercut in terms of pay, from the bottom.
In terms of volume of work for graduates of trade schools vs. tattooists, that point is spot on, once I started to think about the brass tacks of it, prompted by your reply.
My hope had been that people seeking out to be tattooed would be much better informed, given the exposure the public has had to what great tattoos look like via the internet and yes, even the Ink shows on the network Who Must Not Be Named.
Using those shows as an example, how someone can see the quality tattoos put out by a Chris Garver, Tim Hendricks, or Corey Miller and then get some of the tattoos that have been linked to in relation to this 'school' is jaw-dropping.
and how far short current 'schools' fall from even the levels of professionalism found in other arts and trades.
edit: I want to acknowledge that I know that you are against the idea of schools, period. What follows are my own thoughts.
I think that any school should be accredited in some fashion. The fashion is where I think this notion of tattoo schools ultimately falls to pieces, probably, like you state, given ego and the ole mighty dollar.
While I think that you are right, that a fully-accredited tattoo school that is a stand alone, like the Culinary Institute of America is, in the field of cooking, is a bridge too far.
But there could be a middle ground, by having tattoo artists partnering with local art schools/colleges/universities in some form of an interdisciplinary program where an apprentice could learn some fundamentals: health concerns, anatomy, drawing, etc. and then an internship in a shop for six months or a year. That gets them to an Associates of Arts Degree. Then to get their Bachelors, they have a traditional apprenticeship in a shop that ultimately results in producing a portfolio that's graded by both professors and tattoo artists.
I'm sure that many tattoo artists will immediately reject such a notion as outside interference, etc.
But, while everyone has been concentrating on the school and instructors, I do believe some of the students have entered the school for reasons that are not entirely mercenary, namely, bad apprenticeship experiences. For some it is a cop-out, I'm sure, but I'm sure that it's not a cop-out for all.
In terms of barriers to entry, I think that four years of schooling, namely the length of time and the cost, since college isn't cheap, anymore, though with accreditation, hopefully school loans can be utilized can serve as a sort of gut-check.
Not to be presumptuous: but, in the end, for tattooers and the tattooed, what matters is the quality of the tattoo, period.
edit: But I think you are 100% right that the idea of, as someone else has pointed out, creating a 'puppy-mill' that churns out people who think they now can tattoo every two weeks is the death of tattooing. But I think it might be a symptom of another problem, namely the current state of apprenticeships.
edit: I think that if the fundamental mode of teaching in tattooing in breaking down for the vast majority of the field, for a host of reasons, then freezing apprenticeships, while alleviating the harm of a surplus of 'tattooers' will likely not fix the underlying problem that has lead to the rise of tattoo schools, namely poor apprenticeships. I think there certainly are people who are interested in not paying dues by going to schools, but I think most people want to be respected in their field and by their peers, it's just human nature to want that.
Again, thank you for your posts on the issue of schools and for replying to my own questions, which you answered in a great manner.
My apologies for the long comment.