Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, not sure if this is a place to ask about this but I wanted to try.

A friend of mine had a tattoo done recently on her forearm, black line work flower with watercolour-esque colours. It looked great when it was fresh (as always) but as it healed it peeled off far more than what I would consider normal. The black is patchy, but mostly the pink/purple is faded so it's almost invisible. I wanted to ask whether this is just one of those things that can happen or if it could have a specific cause in how it was done or taken care of.

Thanks a lot in advance.

received_381514705841234.jpeg

received_499237587496966.jpeg

Link to comment
https://www.lastsparrowtattoo.com/forum/t/8526-extreme-fading-on-new-tattoo/
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, oboogie said:

Most watercolor-type art doesn't generally last. There is no black outline, and the way the color is applied isn't built for the long term. A touchup would probably end up the same.

So if she wants to save it, would you recommend adding an outline to "keep the colour in" or just go for a solid colour?

17 hours ago, Emesphere said:

Thanks for the reply. Is this style just a bad idea in general or can someone experienced do it well so it lasts?

My wife has a water color-ish tattoo and it has held up fine. The advantage is a)it was done by someone who knew how to do it well, and b) the actual image has a thick strong outline and details with only the color shading done in the water color style

Right. Good application will provide lasting results. 

Many feel that over long periods of time that the style (even when done well) has a higher potential for becoming less discernible just because there is no outline to "hold it together". 

Latest research would seem to suggest It's also going to depend on the initial macrophage response for the particular individual - which is going to vary person to person....and even be contingent on the health of the individual at the time of the tattoo - interesting stuff.  The constant replacement of dead macrophages (and ink re-uptake) during the life of the tattoo also seems to me to possibly account for some of the weird "fully healed tattoo doing odd things every now and again" that some of us have experienced - I would love to see more proper research on this.

Here's a bit of info:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180306101708.htm

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

  Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

  Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

  Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

  You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...