Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is tattooing an animal inhumane, or is it art? Animal Rights lobbyists exclaim in horror as animals receive decorative tattoos from their owners, claiming that animals can’t choose whether or not to not have the tattoos done.

Read the article and brace your-self to be confused, amazed, not sure how to feel ....

http://www.thenatureanimals.com/2010/03/animal-owners-tattoo-and-piercings.html

 

tattoo-pig.jpg

My mind is boggled by this.....WTF

No doubt in my mind - it's wrong, IMHO. It's not art, it's insensitive brutalizing of an animal that has no choice and for no meaningful propose.

Edited by Devious6

I know exactly how to feel ! there is no confusion at all ! it's very clear to me ! it's a fucked up thing to do on ANY living animal,

we can easily and humanely chip pets for ID purposes,

any type of tattooing animals should be illegal.

ART ? LOL far from it. FUCK the whole idea and FUCK the people that are doing that !

Edited by Dan
1 hour ago, zetroc said:

If anyone thinks that pig is alive, I have some news for them.

the one in the picture above may or may  not be,but did you read the entire article ?

and yes,the entire thing could be bullshit,but just the idea of it repulses me.

either way,a microchip is a much better tool for ID than any piercing or tattoos on any animal.

as far as the "ID" thing goes,my dog is "chipped",I saw the procedure and it was like getting a vaccination ,I certainly would never consider piercing or tattooing an innocent animal.

Edited by Dan

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...